A Photo Exhibition at Martin-Gropius-Bau,
Berlin
20 September to 19
December 2012
Dennis Hopper was a photographer for several years before
his creative trajectory was forever altered by the roaring cult film engines of
Easy Rider. In one quote on the wall of
the Martin-Gropius-Bau gallery, Hopper explained that he ‘took photographs to
fill the void inside of him’ during his formative years. After that he ‘never picked up a camera
again.’
Crates of Hopper’s photographic prints were discovered after
his death. He was either preparing for a retrospective exhibition on the
60s—when all of his photos were taken—or someone saw a chance to make some
posthumous pennies. All of the photographs
on view were a very small 7x10” (as if carried around with him in a portfolio)
and yellowed and browned with age. The
effect is meant to give the photos a museum quality, but I found the size and
discoloration distracting for the most part.
Unless he had printed them all himself by hand, there is no reason why
some assistant couldn’t have provided us larger, sharper prints to view.
The man and the era were the stars of the show. With the exception of a few strong images of
iconic figures like Martin Luther King, Jr. (pushed to the right of the frame
by a sea of microphones, perhaps suggesting The Black Voice being heard for the
first time) and some portraits of Andy Warhol (without his usual blond fright
wig) and The Factory artists and some great shots of Hell’s Angels, the
collection struck me as largely a student’s portfolio. Regardless of the time
needed to master the technical aspects of black and white photography, many
additional years are required to even begin to master what Henri
Cartier-Bresson called ‘the decisive moment.’
Hopper’s portraits have the boon of the 60s zeitgeist and the man’s cult
status behind them. However, many of the
shots wouldn’t stand on their own as works of art.
The lost crates were stuffed with images of several
unrelated themes: the 60s in New
York and Los Angeles,
Mexico and various
abstract shots of objects. Among these,
only a few dozen struck my eye as having any great artistic merit other than being
unrelated photo studies made by someone famous.
Walls filled with shots of old peeling posters, paint and rusty metal
only reminds me of what most photographers shoot in their first five
years. You want to show EVERYTHING and
damn the consequences. But the true art
of photography is in synchronizing the tool, the psychology of the moving human
subject and the vision inside of the photographer. This often requires a lifetime of study, dedication,
observation and patience.
I don’t want to minimize the importance of the 60s as a society-shaping
era, nor do I want to criticize the images solely on technique or
execution. Dennis Hopper was both a
product of, a participant in and a partial documentarian of the turbulent
60s. Simply by being Dennis Hopper, he
had access to artists, celebrities, outlaws and counter culture iconoclasts
which very few others could have managed to photograph. His portraits of artists and celebrities are
the most successful due to this relaxed familiarity. It enabled Hopper to capture legends in
repose.
Sounds like a collection worth studying, if only to celebrate an iconic figure, who, as you say, was able to "capture legends in repose."
ReplyDeleteThanks for the informative post!