tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9161193692812797725.post7383409134266307680..comments2013-07-12T13:01:08.067-07:00Comments on Berlin Photographer Craig Robinson: RAW vs. JPG: Apples to Oranges?Craig Robinsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07644114217515103149noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9161193692812797725.post-69541504024083874872010-10-05T14:24:55.657-07:002010-10-05T14:24:55.657-07:00Who says I don't process my images? I can mak...Who says I don't process my images? I can make a superior image in my camera at the time of shooting (a basic concept which eludes many photographers who rely on Photoshop to save them) AND I can make any adjustments in Photoshop which may be needed--all in jpg fine/high quality (the largest jpg setting before the ludicrously large RAW kicks in). I am also a veteran of the analog darkroom. God DAMN I hated the stench of the chemicals and the grain of the film (except TRI-X. GREAT grain). Not to mention the environmental impact (I'm a native Californian Tree Hugger).<br /><br />But when all is said and done, it's still comparing apples to oranges. I like California oranges and you like RAW apples. There's nothing wrong with personal taste.<br /><br />BTW: Why can't you process jpg files in Photoshop? I do it all the time and the results are fabulous!Craig Robinsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07644114217515103149noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9161193692812797725.post-7961501194315416602010-10-05T09:50:49.651-07:002010-10-05T09:50:49.651-07:00Well, if you do not do process your images, I gues...Well, if you do not do process your images, I guess shooting JPG is perfect for you. Who cares? <br /><br />I've went from the analogue darkroom to the digital darkroom, so I need my digital negatives (raw).Markus Svenssonnoreply@blogger.com